Comparison of Linguistic Structures of Jāmāsp Nāmag in Three Iranian Textual Traditions

Authors

    Frank Kamyar PhD Student, Department of History, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
    Farah Zahedi * Department of Iranology-Islamology Research, National Archives and Library Organization of Iran, Tehran, Iran. zahediut@gmail.com
    Latifeh Salamat Bavil Assistant Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

Jamasbname, Pahlavi Language, Syntactic Structure, Conjunctive Pronoun, Compound Verbs

Abstract

Jāmāsp Nāmag is one of the significant texts in the ancient Iranian religious and literary tradition and serves as a principal source of Zoroastrian eschatology. Framed as a dialogue between Wištāsp and Jāmāsp, it contains prophecies regarding the future of humankind and the cosmos. This text exists in three languages—Pahlavi, Pazand, and Persian—and examining its linguistic structures can contribute to understanding the syntactic developments of Middle and New Iranian languages. The present study, aiming to analyze and compare the grammatical structures in the Pahlavi section of the work, investigates verbs, enclitic pronouns, and ezāfe constructions. The research approach is descriptive–analytical and has been conducted using library sources. Modi’s Pahlavi version was selected as the base text and compared with other versions, such as the works of West, Benveniste, Messina, and Assemani. The findings indicate that verbs in the Pahlavi text predominantly appear in compound forms, which is indicative of the syntactic dynamism of the Pahlavi language. Enclitic pronouns play a significant role in sentence cohesion, often occupying subject and object positions. The ezāfe constructions also exhibit a complex and multi-layered structure, which, compared to the Pazand and Persian texts, have undergone simplification. These differences reflect historical processes in language evolution and the transmission of religious concepts within the Zoroastrian tradition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Modi JJ. Jāmāspi: Pahlavi, Pāzend, and Persian Texts. Bombay1903.

2. Messina G. Ayātkār ī Zāmāspīk. Rome1939.

3. Agostini D. Ayādgār ī Jāmāspīg. Rome2017.

4. Benveniste É. A Pahlavi Apocalypse: Zāmāsp-Nāmak. Revue de l'Histoire des Religions (RHR). 1932;106:337-80.

5. Tavadia JC. Pahlavi Language and Literature: Middle Persian. Najmabadi S, editor. Tehran: University of Tehran Press; 1976.

6. Anklesaria BT. Zand-Ākāsīh: Iranian or Greater Bundahišn. Bombay1956.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-22

Submitted

2025-02-19

Revised

2025-05-03

Accepted

2025-05-10

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Kamyar, F. ., Zahedi, F., & Salamat Bavil, L. (1404). Comparison of Linguistic Structures of Jāmāsp Nāmag in Three Iranian Textual Traditions. Treasury of Persian Language and Literature, 3(2), 1-28. https://jtpll.com/index.php/jtpll/article/view/146

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 91

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.