An Examination of Proverbs in the Persian Language from the Perspective of Searle’s Speech Act Theory
Keywords:
Persian proverbs, speech act, Searle’s theory, content analysis, applied linguisticsAbstract
Proverbs, as an inseparable part of the cultural and linguistic heritage of every society, play a significant role in the transmission of knowledge, values, and norms. Despite the importance of these linguistic structures, relatively few studies have undertaken a comprehensive analysis of their speech-act functions, particularly within the theoretical framework of John Searle’s speech act theory, in the Persian language. The aim of this study was to analyze and classify speech acts (assertive, directive, commissive, expressive, and declarative) in a corpus of Persian proverbs and to identify their frequency and distribution in order to achieve a deeper understanding of the communicative nature and dominant functions of proverbs in this language. This research adopted a qualitative–quantitative design and was conducted using a content analysis approach. The statistical population consisted of Persian proverbs, and a purposive sample of 300 proverbs was selected from authoritative sources (including Amsāl o Ḥekam by Dehkhodā and Shakurzādeh’s Dictionary of Twelve Thousand Persian Proverbs) and analyzed. After data extraction, the proverbs were carefully classified and coded based on Searle’s fivefold taxonomy of speech acts. Subsequently, the absolute and percentage frequencies of each category were calculated. In addition to the quantitative analysis, a qualitative analysis of selected examples was conducted to provide a more in-depth explanation of each speech act. The results indicated that among the 300 Persian proverbs examined, assertive speech acts (200 instances, 67.66%) had the highest frequency, primarily functioning to state facts and describe realities. This was followed by directive speech acts (66 instances, 22%), which play a key role in advising, warning, and guiding the addressee’s behavior. Expressive speech acts (29 instances, 9.67%) were associated with the expression of the speaker’s psychological states and emotions. In contrast, commissive speech acts (5 instances, 1.67%) occurred very infrequently and were mostly related to ethical principles concerning promises and commitments rather than the creation of direct obligations. No declarative speech acts (0 instances, 0%) were identified among the Persian proverbs, which can be attributed to the general nature of proverbs and their lack of institutional authority. Overall, the findings demonstrate that Persian proverbs predominantly serve descriptive (assertive) and guiding (directive) functions and are used less frequently for the direct expression of emotions or the creation of personal commitments, while lacking reality-altering (declarative) capabilities.
Downloads
References
1. Khayyerabadi R, Sameni S. Foundations of Linguistics. Tehran: Farhang; 2016.
2. Rash Ahmadi R, Shahmoradi E. Educational and Moral Kurdish Proverbs. Journal of Iranian Folk Culture. 2007(10).
3. Kazemi F. An Inquiry into Nahj al-Balagha from the Linguistic Perspective of Speech Act Theory. Sahifeh Mobin. 2015;20(55):7-38.
4. Kazemi F, Jamshidi S. Speech Act Theory in Persian and English. 1st ed. Tehran: Dastan; 2016.
5. Sharifrad A. An Intercultural Comparative Study on Persian and American Embodiment Proverbs Including Double Sensory Organs. Proverbium. 2024;41(1):73-100.
6. Okotori EB. A Pragmatic Analysis of Selected Kolokuma Proverbs. GPH-International Journal of Educational Research. 2022;5(09):32-8.
7. Makoy JL. A Pragmatic Analysis of the Speech Act of Advice in Yaka Proverbs. International Journal of Linguistics & Communication. 2022;10(1):1-12.
8. Klégr A. Proverbs as Speech Acts in English and Czech. Acta Universitatis Carolinae - Philologica. 2013;3:7-29.
9. Ashipu KBC, Amende C. Proverbs as Circumstantial Speech Acts. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences. 2013;3(7).
10. Sharifi S, Ebrahimi S. Assessing Speech Acts of Curses and Prayers in Persian. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 2012;2(9):1911-6.
11. Aghagolzadeh F. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Evolution of Discourse Analysis in Linguistics. Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi; 2006.
12. Sajedi A. History of Kurdish Literature. 1st ed. Sardasht: Ma'arif; 2002.
13. Hosseini Masoum M, Radmard A. The Impact of Spatio-Temporal Context on Speech Act Analysis: A Frequency Comparison of Speech Acts in Meccan and Medinan Surahs of the Holy Quran. Language Related Research (Jostārhā-ye Zabānī). 2015;6(3):65-92.
14. Namdari I, Ebadi Z. Discourse Analysis of Glad Tidings (Bisharat) in the Quran. Linguistic Researches of the Holy Quran. 2017;6(2):217-36.
15. Najafi Ivaki A, Rasulnia AH, Kaveh Noshabadi A. Textological Analysis of the Shiqshiqiyya Sermon Based on Searle's Speech Act Theory. Research Journal of Nahj al-Balagha. 2017;5(19):1-17.
16. Abbasi M. A Study of Speech Acts in the Translation of the 30th Part of the Holy Quran Based on the Theories of Austin (1962) and Searle (1969): University of Sistan and Baluchestan; 2013.
17. Safavi K. An Introduction to Semantics. 1st ed. Tehran: Islamic Propagation Organization; 2000.
18. Safavi K. Applied Semantics. Tehran: Hamshahri; 2003.
19. Lotfipour K. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. Journal of Linguistics. 1993;9:9-40.
20. Baj R. Investigation of Imperative Acts in the Ayat al-Ahkam of the Holy Quran Based on Austin (1962) and Searle (1979) Speech Act Theories: University of Sistan and Baluchestan; 2017.
21. Ramezanzadeh M. A Study of Speech Acts in a Selection of Contemporary Persian Plays: University of Isfahan; 2007.
22. Pahlavannezhad MR, Estehbanati L. A Study of Speech Acts in the UN Speeches of Iranian and American Presidents (2006). Journal of Foreign Language Research. 2008;51(268):1-22.
23. Shakurzadeh Bolouri I. Ten Thousand Persian Proverbs and Twenty-Five Thousand Equivalents. 1st ed. Mashhad: Astan Quds Razavi; 2010.
24. Dehkhoda AA. Proverbs and Mottos (Amthal o Hikam). 14th ed. Tehran: Amirkabir; 2007.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Shahla Hamed Mohammad (Author); Yousif Sharif Saeed

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.