A Comparative Study of the Dimensions and Components of Self-Purification and Human Education in Dīwān-e Shams by Mawlānā Jalāl al-Dīn Muhammad Balkhī in Dialogue with the Views of Imām Muhammad al-Ghazālī, Ibn ʿArabī, and Mullā Ahmad Naraqī

Authors

    Alireza Izadpanahi PhD Student, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Bushehr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran
    Maryam Parhezkari * Associate Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Bushehr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran mmaryam@iau.ac.ir
    Seyed Mahmoud Seyed Sadeghi Assistant Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Bushehr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran

Keywords:

Maulana Jalaluddin Balkhi, Diwan Shams, Self-Purification, Human Development, Divine Love, Imam Muhammad al-Ghazali, Ibn Arabi, Mulla Ahmad Naraqi, Islamic Mysticism, Mystical Ethics, Spiritual Journey, Intuitive Knowledge, Unity of Being, Moral Refinement, Comparative Studies

Abstract

This study adopts a descriptive-analytical approach rooted in comparative analysis to examine the dimensions and components of self-purification (tazkiyat al-nafs) and human education in Dīwān-e Shams by Mawlānā Jalāl al-Dīn Muhammad Balkhī (Rūmī). It explores these themes in relation to and contrast with the perspectives of three prominent scholars in Islamic mysticism and ethics—Imām Muhammad al-Ghazālī, Muḥyī al-Dīn Ibn ʿArabī, and Mullā Ahmad Naraqī. The objective of this study is to explore the theoretical foundations, methodological approaches, and educational goals of these thinkers, with a particular focus on the role of divine love, religious law (sharīʿa), gnosis (maʿrifa), and ethics in the process of self-purification. The findings indicate that, in contrast to the other scholars examined, Rūmī regards divine love not merely as a means but as the very foundation and ultimate aim of the spiritual journey (sulūk), positioning it as the primary force for liberation from the commanding self (nafs ammāra) and a path toward intuitive knowledge and unification with the Truth. In contrast, al-Ghazālī emphasizes moral refinement, piety, and strict adherence to religious law, situating love within the bounds of religious ethics and servitude to God. Ibn ʿArabī, based on his doctrine of waḥdat al-wujūd (unity of being), conceptualizes self-purification as an epistemic and intuitive process achieved through ontological insight and experiential union with the Divine. Naraqī, with a systematic and ethics-based framework, addresses self-discipline through reason, willpower, and religious teachings, presenting love as the outcome of proper spiritual training. The fundamental divergence in prioritizing love, reason, religious law, or intuition presents a multidimensional portrait of spiritual education within Islamic mysticism. This study, through its comparative analysis, illuminates the diverse mystical and ethical capacities within Islam for human development and opens new horizons for spiritually oriented research in the humanities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Motahhari M. Man and Faith. Tehran: Sadra Publications; 1982.

2. Ghazali M. The Revival of the Religious Sciences (Ihya’ Ulum al-Din). Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi Publications; 1998.

3. Ibn Arabi M. Fusus al-Hikam (The Bezels of Wisdom). Tehran: Mola Publications; 2005.

4. Naraqi MA. Mi’raj al-Sa’adah (The Ascension of Felicity). Tehran: Islami Publications; 2008.

5. Yazdi MR. An Analysis of the Concept of Tazkiyah (Spiritual Purification) in Islamic Mysticism. Islamic Mysticism and Spirituality Quarterly. 2014(9).

6. Zarrinkoub A. The Secret of the Reed: A Study on the Thoughts and Life of Molavi. Tehran: Amir Kabir Publications; 1998.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-15

Submitted

2024-04-17

Revised

2024-05-31

Accepted

2024-06-09

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Izadpanahi, A., Parhezkari, M., & Seyed Sadeghi, S. M. . (1403). A Comparative Study of the Dimensions and Components of Self-Purification and Human Education in Dīwān-e Shams by Mawlānā Jalāl al-Dīn Muhammad Balkhī in Dialogue with the Views of Imām Muhammad al-Ghazālī, Ibn ʿArabī, and Mullā Ahmad Naraqī. Treasury of Persian Language and Literature, 2(2), 241-256. https://jtpll.com/index.php/jtpll/article/view/162

Similar Articles

1-10 of 98

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.