An Analysis of Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream Based on Greimas’s Actantial Model
Keywords:
Story, A Midnight Dream, Grimace Pattern, Character, ShakespeareAbstract
The study of narrative structure in dramatic texts, particularly classical plays, constitutes an effective approach for uncovering their internal logic and semantic mechanisms. The present research aims to analyze the actantial structure of A Midsummer Night’s Dream by William Shakespeare, employing Algirdas Julien Greimas’s actantial model. This study was conducted using a descriptive–analytical method and qualitative content analysis based on library sources. In the analytical process, the six actantial roles proposed by Greimas—Subject, Object of value, Sender, Receiver, Helper, and Opponent—were identified within the narrative, and the position of each character in various narrative situations was examined. The findings indicate that despite the apparent complexities and multilayered structure of the narrative, the overall structure of the play corresponds effectively with the actantial model. The character of Hermia functions as the principal Subject, confronting obstacles such as paternal opposition and a romantic rival, and ultimately attains her objective with the assistance of magical elements. This model not only clarifies the relationships among characters but also facilitates the discovery of the semantic structure and actantial system of the work. The results of the study demonstrate that Greimas’s model constitutes an efficient analytical tool for examining narrative structures in classical dramatic texts.
Downloads
References
1. Asa Berger A. Narratives in Popular Culture, Media, and Everyday Life. 1st ed. Tehran: IRIB Research Center, Kanun-e Andisheh; 2001.
2. Webster R. Studying Literary Theory: An Introduction. 1st ed. Tehran: Sepideh-Sahar; 2003.
3. Greimas AJ. Structural Semantics: An Attempt at a Method. 1st ed. Tehran: Elm Publications; 2008.
4. Mohammadi MH, Abbasi A. Structure of a Myth. 1st ed. Tehran: Chista Publications; 2002.
5. Ahmadi B. Text Structure and Interpretation. 10th ed. Tehran: Markaz Publishing; 2009.
6. Moein B. The Generative Trajectory of Meaning. Collected Papers of the First Seminar on Semiotics of Art. Tehran: Academy of the Arts; 2004.
7. Fay B. Contemporary Philosophy of Social Science: A Multicultural Approach. 2nd ed. Tehran: Tarh-e Now; 2002.
8. Shafiei Kadkani MR. The Literary Resurrection (Lectures on the Literary Theory of Russian Formalists). 2nd ed. Tehran: Sokhan Publications; 2017.
9. Propp V. Morphology of the Folktale. 1st ed. Tehran: Markaz Publishing; 1989.
10. Eagleton T. Literary Theory: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Tehran: Markaz Publishing; 2007.
11. Goldmann L. Genetic Structuralism (Structuralist Criticism). 1st ed. Tehran: Bozorgmehr; 1990.
12. Selden R, Widdowson P. A Reader's Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory. 2nd ed. Tehran: Tarh-e Now; 2005.
13. Shakespeare W. The Complete Dramatic Works of William Shakespeare. 3rd ed. Tehran: Soroush Publications; 2002.
14. Garfield L. Shakespeare Stories. 2nd ed. Tehran: Hermes Publications; 2002.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Soheila Falahatkar (Author); Zohreh Sarmad; Fereshteh Naseri (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.