Examining the Contexts of Personal Writing with Emphasis on the Two Collections Roozha and Roozha dar Rah

Authors

    Akbar Shayanseresht * Associate Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran ashamiyan@birjand.ac.ir
    Negarsadat Masoumzadeh Ph.D. Student in Persian Language and Literature (Lyrical Literature), Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran
    Seyyed Mehdi Rahimi Associate Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran

Keywords:

Personal writing, Contemporary Persian prose, Days, Days on the road

Abstract

Anything that a writer produces concerning their interests, beliefs, experiences, emotions, and the ups and downs of their life in various forms can be classified under the broad concept of personal writing. Due to its reliance on the author's “I,” it is regarded as one of the most significant subjects within lyric literature. The term personal writing may be considered the closest translation of the word autobiography. However, a key distinction between personal writing and autobiography lies in the broader scope of personal writing, which is not limited to biographical information. Rather, it encompasses a variety of genres and forms, ranging from a brief note to an extensive personal narrative. In contemporary Iranian literature, personal writing has undergone numerous transformations over the past century, sometimes under the influence of Western literature. It has appeared in diverse forms such as autobiographies, diaries, and letters. Nevertheless, the form and inclination toward personal writing during the last two decades have brought about a new revolution in this genre. This shift and growing tendency are rooted in the underlying contexts of personal writing as well as changes in the social and cultural norms of society. This study was conducted using a descriptive-analytical method. By examining the works of Mohammad-Ali Eslami Nodoushan and Shahrokh Meskoub, who are regarded as pioneers of personal writing in contemporary Persian literature, and focusing specifically on the two works Roozha and Roozha dar Rah as prominent examples of personal writing, three principal contexts were identified: experience, the desire for immortality, and healing. These three components not only provide the foundation for the composition of the selected works examined in this study but, due to their breadth, depth, and functionality, can also serve as a framework and contextual basis for any self-centered text.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Payandeh H. The Discourse of Criticism: Essays in Literary Criticism. 3rd ed. Tehran: Niloufar; 2015.

2. Eslami Nodoushan MA. Days, Volume 3. 4th ed. Tehran: Yazdan; 2016.

3. Eslami Nodoushan MA. Days, Volume 2. 4th ed. Tehran: Yazdan; 2013.

4. Maskoub S. Days on the Road, Volume 1. 1st ed. Paris: Khavaran; 2000.

5. DiYanni R. You Are What You Read. 3rd ed. Tehran: Bidgol; 2023.

6. Maskoub S. Travelogue. 2nd ed. Paris: Khavaran; 2011.

7. Smith S, Watson J. My Literature. 1st ed. Tehran: Atraf; 2022.

8. Kalafus C. Writing with Immediacy in Memoir. 2023.

9. Dehkhoda AA. Dehkhoda Dictionary. 2nd of the new series ed. Tehran: University of Tehran; 1998.

10. Lopate P. The Art of the Personal Essay: An Anthology from the Classical Era to the Present1995. xlvii-47 p.

11. Asadollahi A. The Method of Genetic Criticism in Literature. Research Journal of the Iranian Academy of Arts. 2007(7):62-92.

12. Akhavat A. Write toward the Light. 7th ed. Tehran: Jahan-e Ketab; 2023.

13. Bahrambeygi M. An Introduction to Criticism. Sokhan-e SAMT. 2006(17):21-32.

14. Amankhani I. A Fresh Look at Literary Theory. 2nd ed. Tehran: Khamoosh Publishing; 2021.

15. Shahsavari MH. Moving in the Fog. 4th ed. Tehran: Cheshmeh; 2019.

16. Pennebaker JW. Writing about Emotional Experiences as a Therapeutic Process. Psychological Science. 1997;8:162-6.

17. Karami MH, Rahimi R. A Reflection on the Inevitability of Death in Gilgamesh and Alexander and the Immortality of Utnapishtim and Khidr. Bustan-e Adab, Shiraz University. 2012;4:150-74.

18. Molavi JM. The Collected Works of Shams-e Tabrizi. 1st ed. Tehran: Saye-ye Nima; 2007.

19. Damrosch D. How to Read World Literature. 1st ed. Tehran: SAMT; 2019.

20. Khayyam OI. The Rubaiyat of Khayyam. 5th ed. Tehran: Hermes; 2020.

21. Razmjoo H. Literary Genres. 3rd ed. Mashhad: Astan Quds Razavi; 1995.

22. Marasigan PR. The Effect of Expressive Writing on the Health Conditions of College Students amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Review of Social Sciences Research. 2022.

Downloads

Published

2027-06-22

Submitted

2026-01-21

Revised

2026-06-01

Accepted

2026-06-08

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Shayanseresht, A., Masoumzadeh, N., & Rahimi, S. M. . (1406). Examining the Contexts of Personal Writing with Emphasis on the Two Collections Roozha and Roozha dar Rah. Treasury of Persian Language and Literature, 1-20. https://jtpll.com/index.php/jtpll/article/view/381

Similar Articles

1-10 of 163

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.